Yesterday's Oregonian ran a story describing my congressman David Wu's sexual exploits with a teenage girl (the daughter of a major campaign contributor) in California. According to the article the young girl did not David Wu's "affection." At this point that is the sum total of the details. Regardless of how this shakes out it is yet another stupid choice a (my) high-ranking politician has made.
Another day at the office for David Wu?
Believe it or not I am less interested in David Wu, or any of the other number of congressmen, senators, etc. that have found colorful ways to gain national publicity and early retirement over the last many months, than I am concerned about the fact that we as a nation tend to put such people in to office in the first place. Don't get me wrong. I have no expectation that politicians are going to be any less human than anyone else. They will make mistakes. Even so it seems that to a large degree many of those elected to office (yes, I know there are notable exceptions) have a tendency towards behavior that suggests self-centeredness rather than self-sacrifice, personal agenda rather than interest in good of those they serve. Okay, so this is no great revelation.
We have a great country, but in many respects our political system is a bit of a mess. If you have ever served on a large committee (I am a university professor so have served on many) you know how hard it can be to come to consensus. In some ways our government is like a BIG committee with the compounded problem of what I have described above. So we end up with a bucket load of "safe" decisions that do little to improve our existence. Do I hear health care anyone? Sadly I am not sure I have a clue how to fix this problem. Do smart and talented leaders go into politics with any regularity? Consider that the President of the United States makes $400K/yr. Senators, congressmen, and Supreme Court justices make $250K or less per year. They would do better to work on making a high percentage of their shots from beyond the arc. What this means is that smart talented leaders who have not reached their full earning potential are unlikely to lead our nation. Instead we get many who seem to like to be in charge, have agendas that largely service the few, and have enough money to actually fund a political campaign. This latter point is huge in that one would be hard pressed to find a senator that ascended to office from a less than $100k/year job. Makes one wonder how such individuals could truly be in touch with the average American even if they wanted to be?
Okay, I'm starting to ramble a bit...but that's the price of writing this in a McDonald's during breakfast. Since I do not want to induce too many early naps I'll finish by saying that if I were king of the world (no, I do not want that job) there are a couple of things I would change about political office and campaigns that I believe would make a difference:
1. Require term limits. I did not used to be in favor of limits but have come to the conclusion an occasional change of scenery is a good thing.
2. Outlaw private political contributions. I firmly believe that politicians should not be financially beholding to anyone. If campaigns were government funded then everyone would have equal access to the people to convey their message regardless of their income.
3. Pay our elected government officials a salary that is worthy of the responsibility they shoulder.
4. Require all elected officials to live by the same rules as the people they serve (check out how good their healthcare is!). I realize this is a bit of an oversimplification, but you get what I mean.
I'll stop there. I long for the day when our government will stop being distracted by Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens so economic recovery and a renewed commitment to education can inch up the priority list.
Cheers
No comments:
Post a Comment